Clarification on the understanding of contrast theory in relation to the article “ON and OFF receptive field processing in the presence of optical scattering”: comment
Author :
Jay Neitz and Maureen NeitzJourna Name:
BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS Country :
USAVolume:
15 issue:2 Year:2024 Views : 214
Abstract:
We are writing to address errors of misrepresentation in the article “ON and OFF receptive field processing in the presence of optical scattering” [Biomed. Opt. Express 14, 2618 (2023) [CrossRef] ]. In their investigation of predictions of “contrast theory” to explain the efficacy of diffusion optics technology (DOT), a myopia control lens design [Br. J. Ophthalmol. 107, 1709 (2023) [CrossRef] ], Breher et al. incorrectly indicated that our contrast theory proposed that the association between cone opsin gene splicing defects and myopia was due to differential involvement in ON- and OFF-visual pathways. In addition, the Authors write that we have “hypothesized enhanced ON contrast sensitivity in myopes,” but we predict the opposite.
APA:Jay Neitz and Maureen Neitz. (Volume-15, Issue-2 -(Year-2024)). Clarification on the understanding of contrast theory in relation to the article “ON and OFF receptive field processing in the presence of optical scattering”: comment. Retrieved from https://opg.optica.org/viewmedia.cfm?uri=boe-15-2-789&seq=0
Chicago:Jay Neitz and Maureen Neitz. "Clarification on the understanding of contrast theory in relation to the article “ON and OFF receptive field processing in the presence of optical scattering”: comment" Example, Volume-15-issue-2-Year-2024-2156-7085. https://opg.optica.org/viewmedia.cfm?uri=boe-15-2-789&seq=0.